Implied Dissent

Monday, August 14, 2006


Let me get this straight. Sterling pays millions of dollars every year to a black man in a position that is mostly filled by white people in the NBA. He seems to have no problem paying many millions to black players (or at least no more problem with that as he does to paying white ones). Yet I'm supposed to believe that he doesn't rent his property to black people, just because they are black? Something tells me that there is something else going on here. Whatever you may think of Donald Sterling, and I am not a fan of the man, he is a shrewd and greedy businessman, so I have a very hard time buying the story we're being told.


Post a Comment

<< Home