Assorted

- It's a trap! I mean, it's a frap!

- How not to ace psychology (hint, don't take a hint).

Give them what they really want

Nay, what they really need. Perhaps NSFW, if your work is sucky about this stuff.

Bigger than Twitter

I wish I had a pithy line to put an exclamation point on this, but I don't. Read it.

Note to self

Don't try to walk from the source of the Amazon to its mouth.

If B, then B

This takes question begging to a whole new level. Usually people just implicitly assume their conclusions. Here Krugman does it explicitly. He starts with the assumption that P is fixed. Then examines what would happen under a given policy and finds that P doesn't change. Wow. Very impressive.
Update: See this Sumner post on this as well. Really hoists Krugman by his own petard. You might say that Krugman is petarded.

Cripple Fight

What's worse, having no evidence, or retarded evidence? Brooks claims that text messages have ruined romance. Based on...nothing that I can see. Yglesias attempts to refute him by referring to The Rules of Attraction, written in the 80s. A NOVEL written in the 80s. And by referring to Mad Men, about an office in the early 60s. A FICTIONAL office in the 60s, written and shot today. I guess I'll go with the retarded evidence as superior, or at least more honest. At least I can point out the problems with it. With Brooks, there's nothing there at all. Winner, Yglesias.

Taking a step back

I probably overdid it with that last post. That's how you know he's probably lying or misleading. It's not 100%.
Also, a dolphin learns to save, invest, and speculate. Woh.

Shorter Mankiw

How do you tell when Krugman is lying? Either his lips are moving or he's typing.
BTW, did anyone else catch Geithner saying on Meet the Press that the number of jobs saved by the stimulus is a fact? Really Timmy? A fact? I accept that it's your best guess at the effect, that the estimate was made in good faith, etc. But it is by no means a fact. It's an estimate based on some models. No more, no less.

Mmm, sacrelicious

An excellent Venn diagram of monsters.

Freedom of what?

Disgusting. Simply disgusting.

NBA predictions

Onto my likely to be mediocre NBA picks.

EASTERN ATLANTIC
Boston 56-26
Philadelphia 43-39
New York 34-48
New Jersey 30-52
Toronto 30-52
EASTERN CENTRAL
Cleveland 61-21
Chicago 43-39
Indiana 41-41
Milwaukee 34-48
Detroit 28-54
EASTERN SOUTHEAST
Orlando 60-22
Atlanta 47-35
Miami 37-45
Charlotte 34-48
Washington 25-57
WESTERN NORTHWEST
Portland 55-27
Utah 51-31
Denver 47-35
Oklahoma City 34-48
Minnesota 25-57
WESTERN PACIFIC
LA Lakers 59-23
Phoenix 42-40
Golden State 35-47
LA Clippers 32-50
Sacramento 20-62
WESTERN SOUTHWEST
San Antonio 60-22
Dallas 53-29
Houston 45-37
New Orleans 44-38
Memphis 25-57

Cleveland over Atlanta, Boston over Orlando. Cleveland over Boston (unfortunately).
San Antonio over Utah, LA over Portland. San Antonio over LA.
San Antonio over Cleveland (but a much better series than in 2007).

Using force to control without ownership is...

Please read Bainbridge on what's going on with the Obama administration and pay cuts at (admittedly sleazy/corrupt) financial firms. Seems to fit a certain term, can't remember what it is, who's definition includes "private property that is controlled but not nationalized".